Title |
Protein storage and root:shoot reallocation provide tolerance to damage in a hybrid willow system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00442-011-2176-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cris G. Hochwender, Dong H. Cha, Mary Ellen Czesak, Robert S. Fritz, Rebecca R. Smyth, Arlen D. Kaufman, Brandi Warren, Ashley Neuman |
Abstract |
To determine the mechanistic basis of tolerance, we evaluated six candidate traits for tolerance to damage using F(2) interspecific hybrids in a willow hybrid system. A distinction was made between reproductive tolerance and biomass tolerance; reproductive tolerance was designated as a plant's proportional change in catkin production following damage, while biomass tolerance referred to a plant's proportional change in biomass (i.e., regrowth) following damage. F(2) hybrids were generated to increase variation and independence among candidate traits. Using three clonally identical individuals, pre-damage candidate traits for tolerance to damage (root:shoot ratio, total nonstructural carbohydrate, and total available protein) and post-damage candidate traits (relative root:shoot ratio, phenolic ratio, and specific leaf area ratio) were measured. The range of variation for these six candidate traits was broad. Biomass was significantly increased two years after 50% shoot length removal, and catkin production was not significantly reduced when damaged, suggesting that F(2) hybrids had great biomass tolerance and reproductive tolerance. Based on multiple regression methods, increased reproductive tolerance was associated with increased protein storage and decreased relative root:shoot ratio (reduced root allocation after damage). In addition, a positive relationship between biomass tolerance and condensed tannins was detected, and both traits were associated with increased reproductive tolerance. These four factors explained 57% of the variance in the reproductive tolerance of F(2) hybrids, but biomass tolerance explained the majority of the variance in reproductive tolerance. Changes in plant architecture in response to plant damage may be the underlying mechanism that explains biomass tolerance. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 72% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |