↓ Skip to main content

Wie funktioniert maschinelles Lernen?

Overview of attention for article published in Die Radiologie, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Wie funktioniert maschinelles Lernen?
Published in
Die Radiologie, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00117-019-00616-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Kleesiek, Jacob M. Murray, Christian Strack, Georgios Kaissis, Rickmer Braren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Engineering 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Die Radiologie
#228
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402,993
of 472,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Radiologie
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.