You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peer supporters for cardiac patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Nursing Review, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.00998.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C.‐J. Wu, A.M. Chang, M. Courtney, K. Kostner |
| Abstract |
To determine whether incorporation of patient peer supporters in a Cardiac-Diabetes Self-Management Program (Peer-CDSMP) led to greater improvement in self-efficacy, knowledge and self-management behaviour in the intervention group compared to a control group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 21% |
| Psychology | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Nursing Review
#171
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,532
of 174,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Nursing Review
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.