You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN HUMAN PERSONALITY: TESTING EVOLUTIONARY MODELS BY ESTIMATING HERITABILITY DUE TO COMMON CAUSAL VARIANTS AND INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF DISTANT INBREEDING
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolution, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01679.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin J.H. Verweij, Jian Yang, Jari Lahti, Juha Veijola, Mirka Hintsanen, Laura Pulkki‐Råback, Kati Heinonen, Anneli Pouta, Anu‐Katriina Pesonen, Elisabeth Widen, Anja Taanila, Matti Isohanni, Jouko Miettunen, Aarno Palotie, Lars Penke, Susan K. Service, Andrew C. Heath, Grant W. Montgomery, Olli Raitakari, Mika Kähönen, Jorma Viikari, Katri Räikkönen, Johan G Eriksson, Liisa Keltikangas‐Järvinen, Terho Lehtimäki, Nicholas G. Martin, Marjo‐Riitta Järvelin, Peter M. Visscher, Matthew C. Keller, Brendan P. Zietsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Germany | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 23% |
| Researcher | 33 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 36% |
| Psychology | 32 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,702,234
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#923
of 6,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,655
of 180,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.