↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,820)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
157 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman Kislov, Catherine Pope, Graham P. Martin, Paul M. Wilson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 241 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Student > Master 13 5%
Other 13 5%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Psychology 16 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 75 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#443,656
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#28
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,616
of 480,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.