You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contingent Advantage? Sovereign Borrowing, Democratic Institutions and Global Capital Cycles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Political Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007123418000455 |
| Authors |
Cameron Ballard-Rosa, Layna Mosley, Rachel L Wellhausen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 44% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,532,782
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Political Science
#275
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,291
of 474,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Political Science
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.