↓ Skip to main content

Auditory contagious yawning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): first evidence for social modulation

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Auditory contagious yawning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): first evidence for social modulation
Published in
Animal Cognition, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0473-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine Silva, Joana Bessa, Liliana de Sousa

Abstract

Dogs' capacity to 'catch' human yawns has recently attracted the attention of researchers in the field of animal cognition. Following recent studies suggesting that contagion yawning in humans, and some other primates, is empathy-related, some authors have considered the possibility that the same mechanism may underlie contagious yawning in dogs. To date, however, no positive evidence has been found, and more parsimonious hypotheses have been put forward. The present study explored the 'contagion-only' hypothesis by testing whether the mere sound of a human yawn can be sufficient to elicit yawning in dogs, in a way that is unaffected by social-emotional factors. Unexpectedly, results showed an interesting interplay between contagion and social effects. Not only were dogs found to catch human yawns, but they were also found to yawn more at familiar than unfamiliar yawns. Although not allowing for conclusive inferences about the mechanisms underlying contagious yawning in dogs, this study provides first data that renders plausible empathy-based, emotionally connected, contagious yawning in these animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 1%
Austria 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 127 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 12 9%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 38%
Psychology 30 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#372,315
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#103
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,607
of 174,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.