| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus ACE/ARB Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Y Tan, Lindsey R Sangaralingham, S Jeson Sangaralingham, Xiaoxi Yao, Nilay D Shah, Shannon M Dunlay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 15% |
| United States | 16 | 13% |
| Argentina | 8 | 7% |
| Colombia | 7 | 6% |
| Mexico | 6 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 5% |
| Egypt | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 20% |
| Scientists | 12 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#487,727
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#116
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,697
of 480,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.