You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Methods for Ex Vivo Analysis of Immune Cell Function from the Central Nervous System
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 222 |
| Book title |
Multiple Sclerosis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/7651_2015_222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2629-9, 978-1-4939-2630-5
|
| Authors |
Turner, Darryl G., Leech, Melanie D., O’Connor, Richard A., Anderton, Stephen M., Darryl G. Turner, Melanie D. Leech, Richard A. O’Connor, Stephen M. Anderton |
| Abstract |
Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an animal model commonly used to investigate the inflammatory response in organ-specific autoimmunity and a model of the early immune responses of multiple sclerosis.This protocol outlines the methods used for the processing of peripheral immune tissues, the spleen and draining lymph nodes, as well as the site of inflammation, the central nervous system (CNS), for analyzing immune cell phenotype and function during murine EAE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Energy | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,323,943
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,917
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,774
of 264,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.