| Title |
Spatial, temporal, and content analysis of Twitter for wildfire hazards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-016-2329-6 |
| Authors |
Zheye Wang, Xinyue Ye, Ming-Hsiang Tsou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 31% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 16% |
| Engineering | 16 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,369,830
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#581
of 1,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,209
of 299,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.