↓ Skip to main content

Validity of ophthalmology surgical competency assessment rubric for strabismus surgery in resident training

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of AAPOS (Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus), April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of ophthalmology surgical competency assessment rubric for strabismus surgery in resident training
Published in
Journal of AAPOS (Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus), April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Walker Motley, Karl C. Golnik, Irene Anteby, Huban Atilla, Glen A. Gole, Claudia Murillo, Scott E. Olitsky, Rachel F. Pilling, Aravind R. Reddy, Pradeep Sharma, R. Michael Siatkowski, Maria B. Yadarola

Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires US residency programs to assess ophthalmology residents for competency in 6 core areas. Ophthalmic surgical skills are currently part of the ACGME "Patient Care" competency, although some have advocated for a seventh competency, "Surgical Skills." The Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric for Strabismus Surgery in Resident Training ( Strabismus) tool was designed to aid in the assessment of surgical skills using procedure specific behavioral anchors. The present study evaluated inter-rater agreement of the Strabismus tool in the assessment of resident performance. Strabismus evaluations of resident surgical strabismus cases were performed by a multinational group of faculty strabismus surgeons. Cronbach α statistical analysis of the completed evaluations revealed high inter-rater agreement, indicating the Strabismus is a reliable tool to facilitate assessment of resident strabismus surgical skills.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 10 31%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 63%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of AAPOS (Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus)
#1,098
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,499
of 314,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of AAPOS (Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus)
#35
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.