| Title |
Responses to alcohol and cigarette use during ecologically assessed drinking episodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-012-2721-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Piasecki, Phillip K. Wood, Saul Shiffman, Kenneth J. Sher, Andrew C. Heath |
| Abstract |
Tobacco and alcohol are frequently used together, and this may be partly explained by a distinct profile of subjective effects associated with co-administration. Ecological momentary assessment studies have examined effects of naturally occurring co-use, but, to date, have not assessed differing effects as alcohol levels rise and fall. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,412,099
of 24,293,076 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#855
of 5,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,783
of 166,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,293,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.