You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MN1 C-terminal truncation syndrome is a novel neurodevelopmental and craniofacial disorder with partial rhombencephalosynapsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/brain/awz379 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher C Y Mak, Dan Doherty, Angela E Lin, Nancy Vegas, Megan T Cho, Géraldine Viot, Clémantine Dimartino, James D Weisfeld-Adams, Davor Lessel, Shelagh Joss, Chumei Li, Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui, Yuri A Zarate, Nadja Ehmke, Denise Horn, Caitlin Troyer, Sarina G Kant, Youngha Lee, Gisele E Ishak, Gordon Leung, Amanda Barone Pritchard, Sandra Yang, Eric G Bend, Francesca Filippini, Chelsea Roadhouse, Nicolas Lebrun, Michele G Mehaffey, Pierre-Marie Martin, Benjamin Apple, Francisca Millan, Oliver Puk, Mariette J V Hoffer, Lindsay B Henderson, Ruth McGowan, Ingrid M Wentzensen, Steven Pei, Farah R Zahir, Mullin Yu, William T Gibson, Ann Seman, Marcie Steeves, Jill R Murrell, Sabine Luettgen, Elizabeth Francisco, Tim M Strom, Louise Amlie-Wolf, Angela M Kaindl, William G Wilson, Sara Halbach, Lina Basel-Salmon, Noa Lev-El, Jonas Denecke, Lisenka E L M Vissers, Kelly Radtke, Jamel Chelly, Elaine Zackai, Jan M Friedman, Michael J Bamshad, Deborah A Nickerson, University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, Russell R Reid, Koenraad Devriendt, Jong-Hee Chae, Elliot Stolerman, Carey McDougall, Zöe Powis, Thierry Bienvenu, Tiong Y Tan, Naama Orenstein, William B Dobyns, Joseph T Shieh, Murim Choi, Darrel Waggoner, Karen W Gripp, Michael J Parker, Joan Stoler, Stanislas Lyonnet, Valérie Cormier-Daire, David Viskochil, Trevor L Hoffman, Jeanne Amiel, Brian H Y Chung, Christopher T Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| China | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,102,936
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#3,342
of 7,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,384
of 459,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#58
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.