| Title |
Neuro-oxidative damage and aerobic potential loss of sharks under elevated CO2 and warming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-016-2898-7 |
| Authors |
Rui Rosa, José Ricardo Paula, Eduardo Sampaio, Marta Pimentel, Ana R. Lopes, Miguel Baptista, Miguel Guerreiro, Catarina Santos, Derek Campos, Vera M.F. Almeida-Val, Ricardo Calado, Mário Diniz, Tiago Repolho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 56% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,424,161
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#851
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,610
of 298,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.