↓ Skip to main content

Effect of secondhand smoke on asthma control among black and Latino children

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of secondhand smoke on asthma control among black and Latino children
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam S. Oh, Haig Tcheurekdjian, Lindsey A. Roth, Elizabeth A. Nguyen, Saunak Sen, Joshua M. Galanter, Adam Davis, Harold J. Farber, Frank D. Gilliland, Rajesh Kumar, Pedro C. Avila, Emerita Brigino-Buenaventura, Rocio Chapela, Jean G. Ford, Michael A. LeNoir, Fred Lurmann, Kelley Meade, Denise Serebrisky, Shannon Thyne, William Rodriguez-Cintron, Jose R. Rodriguez-Santana, L. Keoki Williams, Luisa N. Borrell, Esteban G. Burchard

Abstract

Among patients with asthma, the clinical effect and relative contribution of maternal smoking during pregnancy (in utero smoking) and current secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure on asthma control is poorly documented, and there is a paucity of research involving minority populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 44%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#2,330,001
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1,947
of 11,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,951
of 175,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#19
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.