| Title |
Predictors of Trauma Exposure and Trauma Diagnoses for Children with Autism and Developmental Disorders Served in a Community Mental Health Clinic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-019-04331-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John D. Hoch, Adriana M. Youssef |
| Abstract |
Exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs), and trauma related diagnoses are poorly understood in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and developmental disabilities (DD). The current study examined N = 7695 cases seen by a community mental health provider to compare exposure to PTEs and trauma-related diagnoses between children with ASD, children with DD, and children with other mental health diagnoses (e.g., depression). Predictors included demographics, exposure to negative life events, living situations, and subscales of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Logistic regressions showed that diagnostic group, number and type of negative life events and locations lived, and SDQ subscale scores predicted trauma reports and trauma diagnoses. The findings suggest screener questions that may be useful across diagnostic groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,819,519
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#742
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,570
of 481,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.