↓ Skip to main content

Whirlwind: a new cryptographic hash function

Overview of attention for article published in Designs, Codes and Cryptography, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Whirlwind: a new cryptographic hash function
Published in
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10623-010-9391-y
Authors

Paulo Barreto, Ventzislav Nikov, Svetla Nikova, Vincent Rijmen, Elmar Tischhauser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 57%
Engineering 3 21%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#151
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,143
of 82,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.