| Title |
Quantifying Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity A Comparison of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area and Novel Quantitative Doppler Methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdellaziz Dahou, Geraldine Ong, Nadira Hamid, Eleonora Avenatti, Jing Yao, Rebecca T Hahn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 62% |
| Scientists | 21 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#745,744
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#198
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,385
of 447,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.