↓ Skip to main content

Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, December 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
369 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, December 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf01874733
Authors

A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Oman 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 16 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 32 27%
Engineering 13 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,603,127
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#113
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,371
of 39,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them