| Title |
Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8 |
| Authors |
Tom Brughmans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 311 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 142 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 95 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,461,339
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#105
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,516
of 164,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.