↓ Skip to main content

Co-producing science for sustainability: Can funding change knowledge use?

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-producing science for sustainability: Can funding change knowledge use?
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101979
Authors

James C. Arnott, Rachel J. Neuenfeldt, Maria Carmen Lemos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 21 15%
Other 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 19%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 48 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,496,267
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#582
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,177
of 480,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.