↓ Skip to main content

Getting Neurorehabilitation Right

Overview of attention for article published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,155)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
472 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Getting Neurorehabilitation Right
Published in
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, March 2012
DOI 10.1177/1545968312440745
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W. Krakauer, S. Thomas Carmichael, Dale Corbett, George F. Wittenberg

Abstract

Animal models suggest that a month of heightened plasticity occurs in the brain after stroke, accompanied by most of the recovery from impairment. This period of peri-infarct and remote plasticity is associated with changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance and the spatial extent and activation of cortical maps and structural remodeling. The best time for experience and training to improve outcome is unclear. In animal models, very early (<5 days from onset) and intense training may lead to increased histological damage. Conversely, late rehabilitation (>30 days) is much less effective both in terms of outcome and morphological changes associated with plasticity. In clinical practice, rehabilitation after disabling stroke involves a relatively brief period of inpatient therapy that does not come close to matching intensity levels investigated in animal models and includes the training of compensatory strategies that have minimal impact on impairment. Current rehabilitation treatments have a disappointingly modest effect on impairment early or late after stroke. Translation from animal models will require the following: (1) substantial increases in the intensity and dosage of treatments offered in the first month after stroke with an emphasis on impairment; (2) combinational approaches such as noninvasive brain stimulation with robotics, based on current understanding of motor learning and brain plasticity; and (3) research that emphasizes mechanistic phase II studies over premature phase III clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 563 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 20%
Student > Master 75 13%
Researcher 73 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 121 21%
Unknown 102 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 111 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 110 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 7%
Engineering 35 6%
Other 98 17%
Unknown 127 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,333,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#50
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,851
of 176,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.