↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of an integrated, active rehabilitation protocol in patients ≥ 65 years of age with chronic mechanical low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of an integrated, active rehabilitation protocol in patients ≥ 65 years of age with chronic mechanical low back pain
Published in
European Spine Journal, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-06248-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gautam M. Shetty, Umesh Solanki, Shikha Jain, Sanya Linjhara, Garima Anandani, C. S. Ram, Harshad Thakur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 38%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,704,331
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,519
of 4,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,646
of 458,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#37
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.