| Title |
2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert O. Bonow, Patrick T. O’Gara, David H. Adams, Vinay Badhwar, Joseph E. Bavaria, Sammy Elmariah, Judy W. Hung, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Alanna Morris, Ruby Satpathy, Brian Whisenant, Y. Joseph Woo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#578,269
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,481
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,092
of 477,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#37
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.