| Title |
Long-Term Follow-Up of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Disease The CvLPRIT Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony H. Gershlick, Amerjeet S. Banning, Emma Parker, Duolao Wang, Charley A. Budgeon, Damian J. Kelly, Peter O. Kane, Miles Dalby, Simon L. Hetherington, Gerry P. McCann, John P. Greenwood, Nick Curzen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 14% |
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| Spain | 9 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 62% |
| Scientists | 21 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#567,426
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,458
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,617
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#35
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.