↓ Skip to main content

Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10620-016-4135-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang-Il Kwon, Mark A. Gromski, Stuart Sherman, Jeffrey J. Easler, Ihab I. El Hajj, James Watkins, Evan L. Fogel, Lee McHenry, Glen A. Lehman

Abstract

Multiple factors can affect the occlusion of plastic stents. Previous data demonstrate that side holes may induce more biofilm formation probably via microturbulence and bile flow disturbances that could lead to occlusion. These results, however, have not been replicated in subsequent clinical studies with different methods. The objective of this study is to evaluate the physical characteristics of plastic stent occlusion over time. This is a plastic stent sequential analysis study. Biliary stents removed via ERCP from February 24, 2015, to June 2, 2015, were included. One hundred and forty-eight retrieved straight-type plastic stents were longitudinally cut by a custom-made cutting device. These dissected stents were then evaluated in detail with regard to the location of stent occlusion and the stent patency period. Location of stent occlusive debris was the primary outcome in this study. Biofilm formations and occlusions by debris were sequentially but separately tallied. Biofilm formations were initially seen around the side hole areas within 30 days and spread to the entire stent by 60 days. Then, occlusion process by debris was mainly initiated by 80 days and progressed to full occlusion by median of 90 days. Although some occlusions were also observed around the side hole areas within 30 days, affected areas were more widely observed after biofilm formation. This study is the first to attempt to describe the distribution of stent occlusions over time. These observations may help guide future stent development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,661,250
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,314
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,811
of 301,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.