You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Review of techniques to remove a Foley catheter when the balloon does not deflate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Urology, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01483-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Siamak Daneshmand, David Youssefzadeh, Eila C Skinner |
Abstract |
Failure of a Foley balloon to deflate may be caused by a faulty valve mechanism, blockage of the inflation channel, or, rarely, crystallization of the fluid within the balloon. We discuss the approach to successful management and present a stepwise algorithm to remove the catheter safely and expeditiously. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 28% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Urology
#5,406
of 7,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,590
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urology
#28
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.