↓ Skip to main content

Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
300 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
Published in
Environmental Management, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00267-019-01234-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia A. Taylor, Joyce S. Tsuji, Michael R. Garry, Margaret E. McArdle, William L. Goodfellow, William J. Adams, Charles A. Menzie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 362 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 23 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 3%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 167 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 44 12%
Engineering 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Environmental Science 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 189 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,377,981
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#533
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,146
of 474,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.