↓ Skip to main content

Oncogenic viruses: Lessons learned using next-generation sequencing technologies

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oncogenic viruses: Lessons learned using next-generation sequencing technologies
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronan Flippot, Gabriel G. Malouf, Xiaoping Su, David Khayat, Jean-Philippe Spano

Abstract

Fifteen percent of cancers are driven by oncogenic human viruses. Four of those viruses, hepatitis B virus, human papillomavirus, Merkel cell polyomavirus, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus, integrate the host genome. Viral oncogenesis is the result of epigenetic and genetic alterations that happen during viral integration. So far, little data have been available regarding integration mechanisms and modifications in the host genome. However, the emergence of high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic tools enables researchers to establish the landscape of genomic alterations and predict the events that follow viral integration. Cooperative working groups are currently investigating these factors in large data sets. Herein, we provide novel insights into the initiating events of cancer onset during infection with integrative viruses. Although much remains to be discovered, many improvements are expected from the clinical point of view, from better prognosis classifications to better therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#4,993
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,661
of 312,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#39
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.