↓ Skip to main content

Comment on: ‘NICE, in Confidence: An Assessment of Redaction to Obscure Confidential Information in Single Technology Appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Comment on: ‘NICE, in Confidence: An Assessment of Redaction to Obscure Confidential Information in Single Technology Appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40273-019-00875-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Livio Garattini, Nicholas Freemantle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,704,331
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,660
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,864
of 430,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.