Title |
Using quality indicators to predict inspection ratings: cross-sectional study of general practices in England
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x707141 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Allen, Kieran Walshe, Nathan Proudlove, Matt Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 59% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
Scientists | 10 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 27% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,088,414
of 25,203,135 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,004
of 4,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,471
of 444,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#21
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,203,135 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.