↓ Skip to main content

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Window to Management of the Axilla

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Primary Breast Cancer: Window to Management of the Axilla
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00268-012-1635-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashwini Kumar, Ruchir Puri, Pranjali V. Gadgil, Ismail Jatoi

Abstract

In patients with primary breast cancer, several large, randomized prospective trials have shown that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) substantially reduces the morbidity associated with axillary surgery compared with formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Moreover, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial has demonstrated that when the sentinel node reveals no evidence of metastatic disease, then no further ALND is required. Recently, the results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial have challenged the notion that all patients with metastases to the sentinel node require ALND. The results of this trial suggest that in selected sentinel node-positive patients, ALND can be potentially avoided. Yet, some concerns about the ACOSOG Z0011 trial have been raised, and these concerns may have implications in the widespread implementation of the results of this trial. Since the advent of the SNB technology, occult metastases within the sentinel node are frequently observed, and the significance of these findings remains controversial. Finally, this review considers special situations, such as pregnancy and the neoadjuvant setting, where the use of SNB should be applied judiciously. The SNB technology has dramatically improved the quality of life for women with breast cancer, and further modifications of its role in breast cancer treatment should be based on evidence obtained from randomized, controlled trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%