↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Attractiveness and Status in Dating Desire in Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Attractiveness and Status in Dating Desire in Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9855-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thao Ha, Judith E. M. van den Berg, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff

Abstract

The present study examined partner preferences of homosexual and heterosexual men and woman, focusing on attractiveness and status. Homosexual (N=591 men; M age=28.87 years, SD=10.21; N=249 women; M age=33.36 years, SD=13.12) and heterosexual participants (N=346 men; M age=39.74 years, SD=14.26; N=400 women; M age=35.93 years, SD=13.72) rated the importance of attractiveness and social status of potential partners and then, in a vignette test, expressed their desire to date hypothetical potential partners based on photographs that varied in attractiveness and status-related profiles. With ratings, heterosexual men valued attractiveness the most, followed by homosexual men, heterosexual women, and homosexual women. Heterosexual women rated social status as most important. When status profiles were manipulated and accompanied with photographs of faces, the pattern of differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals supported the self-reported results. Overall, homosexual men and women have similar mate preferences to heterosexual men and women by showing more dating desire for attractive and high social status persons. Compared to attractiveness, status played a smaller role in dating desire.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Czechia 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 109 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 57%
Social Sciences 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,809,746
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,982
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,729
of 135,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.