Title |
Spatial and temporal variability of unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the eastern Seto Inland Sea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fisheries Science, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12562-016-0983-y |
Authors |
Ryoya Hashimoto, Hiroyasu Watai, Kazutaka Miyahara, Yoshihiko Sako, Takashi Yoshida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,802,399
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#461
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,117
of 300,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.