| Title |
Quality Assurance for Carotid Stenting in the CREST-2 Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brajesh K. Lal, Gary S. Roubin, Kenneth Rosenfield, Donald Heck, Michael Jones, Brian Jankowitz, Tudor Jovin, Seemant Chaturvedi, Guilherme Dabus, Christopher J. White, William Gray, Jon Matsumura, Barry T. Katzen, L. Nelson Hopkins, Minerva Mayorga-Carlin, John D. Sorkin, George Howard, James F. Meschia, Thomas G. Brott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 40% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#990,304
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,434
of 16,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,772
of 482,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#57
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.