| Title |
Malnutrition and Perioperative Nutritional Support in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients: Results from a Prospective Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-08121-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paola Previtali, Marco Fiore, Jacopo Colombo, Irina Arendar, Luca Fumagalli, Marta Pizzocri, Chiara Colombo, Nicolò N. Rampello, Luigi Mariani, Alessandro Gronchi, Daniela Codazzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,095,744
of 24,709,170 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,946
of 6,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,638
of 441,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#41
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,709,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.