| Title |
Differential cognitive effects of Ginkgo biloba after acute and chronic treatment in healthy young volunteers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-005-2206-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Elsabagh, David E. Hartley, Osama Ali, Elizabeth M. Williamson, Sandra E. File |
| Abstract |
Acute doses of Ginkgo biloba have been shown to improve attention and memory in young, healthy participants, but there has been a lack of investigation into possible effects on executive function. In addition, only one study has investigated the effects of chronic treatment in young volunteers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,568,908
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#612
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,433
of 76,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#9
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.