You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Illuminating subduction zone rheological properties in the wake of a giant earthquake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aax6720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan R. Weiss, Qiang Qiu, Sylvain Barbot, Tim J. Wright, James H. Foster, Alexander Saunders, Benjamin A. Brooks, Michael Bevis, Eric Kendrick, Todd L. Ericksen, Jonathan Avery, Robert Smalley, Sergio R. Cimbaro, Luis E. Lenzano, Jorge Barón, Juan Carlos Báez, Arturo Echalar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| Germany | 4 | 11% |
| Singapore | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Scientists | 12 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 51% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,120,649
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#5,784
of 12,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,121
of 474,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#167
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.