You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What determines the downstream evolution of turbidity currents?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116023 |
| Authors |
Catharina J. Heerema, Peter J. Talling, Matthieu J. Cartigny, Charles K. Paull, Lewis Bailey, Stephen M. Simmons, Daniel R. Parsons, Michael A. Clare, Roberto Gwiazda, Eve Lundsten, Krystle Anderson, Katherine L. Maier, Jingping P. Xu, Esther J. Sumner, Kurt Rosenberger, Jenny Gales, Mary McGann, Lionel Carter, Edward Pope, Monterey Coordinated Canyon Experiment Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Greece | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| China | 2 | 7% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 46% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,820,637
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#566
of 5,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,683
of 473,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#14
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.