↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Emotion Regulation in Moral Judgment

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Emotion Regulation in Moral Judgment
Published in
Neuroethics, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12152-016-9261-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea Helion, Kevin N. Ochsner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 44 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 38%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Philosophy 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 45 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,788,191
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#163
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,019
of 300,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.