You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole-body MRI compared with standard pathways for staging metastatic disease in lung and colorectal cancer: the Streamline diagnostic accuracy studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta23660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart A Taylor, Susan Mallett, Anne Miles, Stephen Morris, Laura Quinn, Caroline S Clarke, Sandy Beare, John Bridgewater, Vicky Goh, Sam Janes, Dow-Mu Koh, Alison Morton, Neal Navani, Alfred Oliver, Anwar Padhani, Shonit Punwani, Andrea Rockall, Steve Halligan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Jordan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,912,945
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#324
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,610
of 483,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.