↓ Skip to main content

RNA Pol II transcription model and interpretation of GRO-seq data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
RNA Pol II transcription model and interpretation of GRO-seq data
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00285-016-1014-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel E. Lladser, Joseph G. Azofeifa, Mary A. Allen, Robin D. Dowell

Abstract

A mixture model and statistical method is proposed to interpret the distribution of reads from a nascent transcriptional assay, such as global run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) data. The model is annotation agnostic and leverages on current understanding of the behavior of RNA polymerase II. Briefly, it assumes that polymerase loads at key positions (transcription start sites) within the genome. Once loaded, polymerase either remains in the initiation form (with some probability) or transitions into an elongating form (with the remaining probability). The model can be fit genome-wide, allowing patterns of Pol II behavior to be assessed on each distinct transcript. Furthermore, it allows for the first time a principled approach to distinguishing the initiation signal from the elongation signal; in particular, it implies a data driven method for calculating the pausing index, a commonly used metric that informs on the behavior of RNA polymerase II. We demonstrate that this approach improves on existing analyses of GRO-seq data and uncovers a novel biological understanding of the impact of knocking down the Male Specific Lethal (MSL) complex in Drosophilia melanogaster.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Engineering 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,147,331
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#70
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,675
of 303,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.