↓ Skip to main content

Osteoclast abnormalities in fractured bone during bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Osteoclast abnormalities in fractured bone during bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis: a case report
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00256-012-1407-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. J. V. Vigorita, J. S. Silver, E. O. E. Eisemon

Abstract

Bisphosphonates have been widely used in the treatment of an array of bone disorders. Recent complications have included unusual femoral fractures in patients who have received long term bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis. Although it has been shown that bisphosphonates are effective by blunting osteoclast resorption, there has been little morphologic description of the local tissue activity at the site of these unusual fractures. To evaluate for local changes to bone morphology at the fracture site in patients presenting with a bisphosphonate-related femur fracture, a sample of cortical bone was obtained at the site of a bisphosphonate fracture and was processed in a nondecalcified manner. The specimen was evaluated for potential cellular changes consistent with bisphosphonate treatment. Significant osteoclast abnormalities at the fracture site were found in a 69-year-old woman treated for 2 years with Fosamax substantiating that bone remodeling at this site is distinctly abnormal. Addressing the osteoclast dysfunction should be a focus of future therapeutic attention and intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,537
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#1,320
of 1,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,724
of 161,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.