| Title |
Report of the 13th Genomic Standards Consortium Meeting, Shenzhen, China, March 4–7, 2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.2876184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack A. Gilbert, Yiming Bao, Hui Wang, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Scott C. Edmunds, Norman Morrison, Folker Meyer, Lynn M. Schriml, Neil Davies, Peter Sterk, Jared Wilkening, George M. Garrity, Dawn Field, Robert Robbins, Daniel P. Smith, Ilene Mizrachi, Corrie Moreau |
| Abstract |
This report details the outcome of the 13(th) Meeting of the Genomic Standards Consortium. The three-day conference was held at the Kingkey Palace Hotel, Shenzhen, China, on March 5-7, 2012, and was hosted by the Beijing Genomics Institute. The meeting, titled From Genomes to Interactions to Communities to Models, highlighted the role of data standards associated with genomic, metagenomic, and amplicon sequence data and the contextual information associated with the sample. To this end the meeting focused on genomic projects for animals, plants, fungi, and viruses; metagenomic studies in host-microbe interactions; and the dynamics of microbial communities. In addition, the meeting hosted a Genomic Observatories Network session, a Genomic Standards Consortium biodiversity working group session, and a Microbiology of the Built Environment session sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 17% |
| China | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#225
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,312
of 178,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.