↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different tissue clearing methods and 3D imaging techniques for visualization of GFP-expressing mouse embryos and embryonic hearts

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of different tissue clearing methods and 3D imaging techniques for visualization of GFP-expressing mouse embryos and embryonic hearts
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00418-016-1441-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hana Kolesová, Martin Čapek, Barbora Radochová, Jiří Janáček, David Sedmera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Engineering 13 8%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#986
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,484
of 314,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.