You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Removal of cattle grazing correlates with increases in vegetation productivity and in abundance of imperiled breeding birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108378 |
| Authors |
Sharon A. Poessel, Joan C. Hagar, Patricia K. Haggerty, Todd E. Katzner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 93% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 16% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,307,572
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,118
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,668
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#55
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.