You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices
|
---|---|
Published in |
PeerJ, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.7717/peerj.2011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luke C. Carey, Serina Stretton, Charlotte A. Kenreigh, Linda T. Wagner, Karen L. Woolley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
Russia | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
Scientists | 7 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 29% |
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,355,418
of 24,287,598 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#1,454
of 14,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,641
of 309,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#42
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.