You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
United Front, Clientelism, and Indirect Rule: Theorizing the Role of the “Liaison Office” in Hong Kong
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Contemporary China, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/10670564.2019.1704996 |
Authors |
Eliza W. Y. Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 3 | 30% |
Australia | 2 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Turkey | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 14 | 56% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,476,885
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Contemporary China
#205
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,088
of 483,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Contemporary China
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.