↓ Skip to main content

Ticagrelor versus Aspirin in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
551 X users
facebook
42 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
425 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ticagrelor versus Aspirin in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1603060
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Claiborne Johnston, Pierre Amarenco, Gregory W Albers, Hans Denison, J Donald Easton, Scott R Evans, Peter Held, Jenny Jonasson, Kazuo Minematsu, Carlos A Molina, Yongjun Wang, K S Lawrence Wong

Abstract

Background Ticagrelor may be a more effective antiplatelet therapy than aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Methods We conducted an international double-blind, controlled trial in 674 centers in 33 countries, in which 13,199 patients with a nonsevere ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack who had not received intravenous or intraarterial thrombolysis and were not considered to have had a cardioembolic stroke were randomly assigned within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 90 mg twice daily for days 2 through 90) or aspirin (300 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg daily for days 2 through 90). The primary end point was the time to the occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 90 days. Results During the 90 days of treatment, a primary end-point event occurred in 442 of the 6589 patients (6.7%) treated with ticagrelor, versus 497 of the 6610 patients (7.5%) treated with aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.01; P=0.07). Ischemic stroke occurred in 385 patients (5.8%) treated with ticagrelor and in 441 patients (6.7%) treated with aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.00). Major bleeding occurred in 0.5% of patients treated with ticagrelor and in 0.6% of patients treated with aspirin, intracranial hemorrhage in 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, and fatal bleeding in 0.1% and 0.1%. Conclusions In our trial involving patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, ticagrelor was not found to be superior to aspirin in reducing the rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death at 90 days. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01994720 .).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 551 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 558 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 82 14%
Researcher 72 13%
Student > Bachelor 56 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 9%
Student > Postgraduate 48 8%
Other 159 28%
Unknown 107 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 288 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 46 8%
Neuroscience 33 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 129 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#47,493
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,606
of 32,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#939
of 319,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#33
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.