↓ Skip to main content

Negotiating Safer Sex Among Married Women in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Negotiating Safer Sex Among Married Women in Ghana
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-9960-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Y. Tenkorang

Abstract

Recent evidence across sub-Saharan Africa shows married women face heightened risks of contracting HIV compared to the never-married. Vulnerability of married women to HIV infection is linked to a number of factors including their inability to negotiate safer sex, inter alia, asking their husbands to use condoms or refusing sexual intercourse even in high risk situations. This study examined what influences married women's ability to say they can ask their sexual partners to use condoms or refuse sexual intercourse. Demographic and Health Survey data from 2,950 married women were analyzed using complementary log-log models. Married women in Ghana were more likely to say they can ask their husbands to use condoms when they know condoms can protect against HIV transmission and had been tested for their HIV serostatus. Also, women who know sexual abstinence can protect against HIV transmission were more likely to say they can refuse sex. Wealthier and highly educated women were more likely to say they can refuse to have sex with their husbands or ask them to use condoms, compared to poorer and less educated women. It is recommended that policy makers promote specific knowledge related to HIV prevention (condom use, HIV testing), while improving the social and economic circumstances of married women in Ghana.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Psychology 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,925
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,333
of 163,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.